June 12
1.0
Section Text 1.1
Sociocultural

The Perennials: An Interview with Mauro Guillén

By: Deanna Laufer | November 20, 2023
Share
founderiepitching

Because of increasing life expectancy, a greater number of generations are learning, working, and living together. And there are signs that they may cast aside the old model of sequential living--learn, work, retire--for one that that is more fluid and where it no longer makes sense to categorize people by the decade in which they were born.

When

Thursday, April 27, 2023

9:00 a.m. – 10:00 a.m. ET

Where

Zoom

Meeting ID: 994 3158 6099
Passcode: 253444

  • Facebook.
  • Twitter.
  • LinkedIn.
  • Print

In this discussion, Deanna Laufer, VP of Research at FCAT, speaks with Mauro Guillén, author and professor of management at the Wharton School, about the themes in his new book, The Perennials: The Megatrends Creating a Postgenerational Society.

1. In one chapter of your book, The Rise and Fall of the Nuclear Family, you say that married households with children only make up 18% of all U.S. households. Yet, it seems to me, this type of household is still the cultural reference point when it comes to home building, zoning, consumer products, and financial planning. At what point do you think this will change?

When things change very fast it takes a lot of time for individuals to adjust, and it takes even longer for companies or the government to adjust. We’re completely out of whack right now. What needs to happen is that we all change our mindset. Maybe education should play a role in that. The other big thing is the role of women, which is related to households. About 39% of American women who are married make more money than their husbands, now women have more money, they have more power. So we’re in a completely different world. And some people haven’t realized it.

2. You said we’ve gone from “raising children successfully” to “raising successful children.” How do we stop treating children as investment projects?

Part of the problem is because there is a linear path through life. You go to school. You have to study really hard. You have to pick your major really early so that you can graduate, get the good job, and make your way up the career ladder. So if we move away from this linear mindset, that is going to relieve some of the pressure that we’re putting on children. You can tell a 14-year-old that they don’t have to make up their mind as to what they want to be in life by age 18, because they’re going to have several shots at this. You can make mistakes.

Technology is changing so fast that maybe when you turn 29 or 35 or 40, you’re going to have to go back to school anyway, because things are so different. You know what the labor market is going to look like in the next 5 years. But how about over the next 30 years? Who knows? Most of the jobs that we have today maybe won’t exist in 30 years; there’s going to be other jobs. The problem is that we’re trying to educate people for the jobs that are going to be out there in 20 years or 30 years from now. And that’s an impossible task. So unless you move into lifelong learning, it’s going to be really difficult.

3. Do you think the shift away from a sequential model of life and could reduce educational inequality, income inequality, or retirement inequalities in the U.S.?

The current model, the sequential model of life, forces a lot of people out of the system or to the margins of the system. I list a number of groups: teenage mothers, people who drop out of high school, people who lose their jobs at age 45, or 50. And they find it very difficult to find something else that is comparable. If we manage it correctly, any change in the direction that I outlined in the book should reduce inequality, especially for women.

And I think we can be happier also. I think most people really love to learn. And so if you give people more opportunities to learn, just imagine the productivity increases that we’re going to see. But we’re not setting up things in a way that helps that lifelong learning model. For example: most fellowships say they are for people who have graduated within the last 5 years. Why? Another example would be that if you withdraw money from your retirement savings when you’re 45, because you want to take a couple of years off to go to school, the IRS penalizes you. A lot of things have been designed in such a way that we study, then we work, then we retire with zero flexibility. And the economy doesn’t like that.

  • Facebook.
  • Twitter.
  • LinkedIn.
  • Print
Deanna Laufer is VP of Research at FCAT, where she leads research examining sociocultural trends like the new adulthood, our income mosaic future, and the evolution of trust.
close
Please enter a valid e-mail address
Please enter a valid e-mail address
Important legal information about the e-mail you will be sending. By using this service, you agree to input your real e-mail address and only send it to people you know. It is a violation of law in some jurisdictions to falsely identify yourself in an e-mail. All information you provide will be used by Fidelity solely for the purpose of sending the e-mail on your behalf.The subject line of the e-mail you send will be "Fidelity.com: "

Your e-mail has been sent.
close

Your e-mail has been sent.

Related Articles

Sociocultural
By: Deanna Laufer | November 20, 2023
In this discussion, Deanna Laufer, VP of Research at FCAT, speaks with Mauro Guillén, author and professor of management at the Wharton School, about the themes in his new book, The Perennials: The Megatrends Creating a Postgenerational Society.
11/20/2023
Article
Sociocultural
By: Deanna Laufer | November 1, 2023
The US expat community has doubled in the last two decades as Americans have sought a more affordable, and in some cases, better quality of life abroad. The rise in digital nomad visas and remote work could further boost this trend. Yet financial challenges remain largely unsolved for Americans abroad, making it harder for them to invest, save and plan.
10/31/2023
Article
Sociocultural
By: John Dalton | October 18, 2023
In her most recent book, 24/6: The Power of Unplugging One Day A Week, Tiffany Shlain, Emmy-nominated filmmaker and founder of the Webby Awards, explains how turning off our screens can enhance our well-being, focus, relationships and creativity. John Dalton, VP of Research at FCAT, spoke with Tiffany about her experiences embracing a break from tech and why she believes more of us should shut down our devices more regularly.
10/18/2023
Article

This website is operated by Fidelity Center for Applied Technology (FCAT)® which is part of Fidelity Wealth Technologies, LLC, a Fidelity Investments company. FCAT experiments with and provides innovative products, services, content and tools, as a service to its affiliates and as a subsidiary of FMR LLC. Based on user reaction and input, FCAT is better able to engage in technology research and planning for the Fidelity family of companies. FCATalyst.com is independent of fidelity.com. Unless otherwise indicated, the information and items published on this web site are provided by FCAT and are not intended to provide tax, legal, insurance or investment advice and should not be construed as an offer to sell, a solicitation of an offer to buy, or a recommendation for any security by any Fidelity entity or any third-party. In circumstances where FCAT is making available either a product or service of an affiliate through this site, the affiliated company will be identified. Third party trademarks appearing herein are the property of their respective owners. All other trademarks are the property of FMR LLC.


1150441.1.0


This is for persons in the U.S. only.


245 Summer St, Boston MA

© 2008-2024 FMR LLC All right reserved | FCATalyst.com


Terms of Use | Privacy | Security | DAT Support